ArticleJournal of community health2026
Trends in Selective Childhood Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccine Nonreceipt Surrounding the MMR-Autism Controversy: National Immunization Survey Analyses, 1996-2019.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While vaccination has been hailed as one of the most significant, life-saving public health achievements, vaccine hesitancy and resistance has consistently come from those concerned about risks associated with vaccinating children. The Wakefield et al. paper published in The Lancet in 1998 claiming that the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine caused autism was a pivotal moment in the modern anti-vaccine movement despite its retraction from the journal in 2010. The public-use files of the National Immunization Survey (NIS-Child) were used to evaluate temporal trends surrounding the publication and subsequent retraction of the Wakefield et al. paper at key points between the period 1996 to 2019. The primary outcome was MMR nonreceipt. Demographic factors associated with vaccination status were assessed using a logistic regression model. The odds of selective MMR nonreceipt increased from 1.3 in 2000 (CI: 1.296-1.303) to 2.1 (CI: 2.050-2.066) in 2019. Across all four NIS survey years analyzed, higher maternal education level correlated with higher odds of selective MMR nonreceipt. Other key demographic factors that demonstrated significantly higher odds of selective MMR nonreceipt included income bracket greater than $50,000 and attending a private medical practice. The odds of both overall and selective MMR nonreceipt increased over time with no reduction observed after the retraction of the Wakefield et al. paper. Key demographic factors outlined herein provide an opportunity for targeted outreach to encourage increased MMR vaccination uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42458106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.