Observational studyAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Microneedle Therapy System Combined with Glucose 10% for the Treatment of Enlarged Pores and Fine Wrinkles.
Observational study in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnlarged pores and fine wrinkles are common cosmetic concerns in Asian patients. While energy-based devices and injectables are widely available, many patients prefer procedures associated with minimal downtime, low risk, and natural outcomes.
objectivesTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of microneedle therapy system (MTS) followed by topical application of glucose 10% with hyaluronic acid (Sihler G, Seoul, Republic of Korea) in Korean patients seeking improvement in skin texture, pore size, and fine wrinkles.
methodsIn this prospective single-arm observational study, forty Korean patients (24 women and 16 men; aged 28-72 years) underwent three to four MTS sessions at 4-week intervals. Immediately after microneedling, glucose 10% with hyaluronic acid was applied topically to the treated facial regions. In this prospective single-arm observational study, forty Korean patients (24 women and 16 men; aged 28-72 years) underwent three to four MTS sessions at 4-week intervals. Immediately after microneedling, glucose 10% with hyaluronic acid was applied topically to the treated facial regions. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline and at the final follow-up visit after completion of treatment (12 weeks for three sessions or 16 weeks for four sessions) by two independent physicians using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Patients also self-rated outcomes using GAIS, and satisfaction was recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Pore size was evaluated using a photonumeric pore grading scale, and fine wrinkles were assessed using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). Safety and tolerability were recorded. Given the exploratory nature of the study and absence of comparator arms, analyses were primarily descriptive.
resultsAt the final follow-up evaluation (12-16 weeks, depending on number of sessions), two physicians rated 73 per cent of patients as "much improved" or "very much improved" on GAIS. Patient-reported GAIS was similar, with 80 per cent rating themselves in these categories. Mean satisfaction scores increased from 2.3 at baseline to 8.5 at study completion. Improvements in pore grading were observed in 78 per cent of patients, while WSRS scores improved in 68 per cent. The procedure was well tolerated, with only transient erythema and mild swelling.
conclusionsMTS combined with topical glucose 10% and hyaluronic acid was associated with clinical improvement in pore refinement and fine wrinkles in this cohort of Korean patients. Given the absence of a control group, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42458044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.