ArticleScientific reports2026
Maintenance pemetrexed after platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy and survival outcomes in malignant pleural mesothelioma in a multicenter real world study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis, and the role of maintenance therapy after first-line platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy remains unclear. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including 96 patients with metastatic or unresectable MPM treated across eight tertiary oncology centers. Eligible patients had received at least four cycles of first-line platinum-pemetrexed and achieved disease control, after which they were either administered maintenance pemetrexed (n = 54) or observed without further treatment (n = 42). Maintenance pemetrexed was associated with significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (15.5 vs. 7.9 months; p < 0.001) and overall survival (22.3 vs. 16.4 months; p = 0.002) compared with observation. Multivariate analyses confirmed maintenance pemetrexed as an independent predictor of improved progression-free survival (HR 2.92; 95% CI 1.81-4.72; p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.24-3.55; p = 0.005). Non-epithelioid histology was independently associated with worse outcomes. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the survival benefit of maintenance pemetrexed persisted in patients achieving both partial response and stable disease after first-line chemotherapy. Importantly, maintenance therapy was well tolerated, with no discontinuations due to toxicity, highlighting its feasibility in routine practice. These real-world findings suggest that maintenance pemetrexed may be associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with MPM who achieve disease control after first-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.