ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantifying the added value of foot-controlled force variables in predicting mild cognitive impairment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting early cognitive decline is important for timely interventions. However, existing approaches for early detection remain limited by cost, scalability, or concerns about their validity. This study evaluated the potential of lower-extremity force control capacities, a largely unexplored area, to improve prediction of cognitive status in older adults with and without Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). MCI refers to an early stage of cognitive decline that does not meet criteria for dementia. 224 participants aged 80-91 years completed a foot-pedal tracking task in which they continuously adjusted the force applied to a pedal to match a visual target curve presented at two different frequencies. The task was designed to capture ongoing visuomotor monitoring and fine motor control. Task performance was quantified using measures of tracking accuracy (Root Mean Square Error, RMSE) and signal complexity (Sample Entropy, SampEn). These reflect how precisely participants controlled force and how regular their output was over time. Participants with MCI showed lower accuracy and lower complexity than cognitively healthy individuals. Adding RMSE and SampEn to a baseline prediction model improved model performance, with the largest gains observed at the higher curve frequency: RMSE contributed 13% new predictive information, SampEn 17%, and both variables together 21%. These gains indicate that foot-controlled force measures added meaningful information beyond established predictors, although confirmation in independent samples is needed. Foot-controlled force tasks may therefore provide a quick-to-administer, objective complement for early detection of cognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.