ArticleNature communications2026
Sensory-guided human-machine joint learning accelerates the acquisition of motor imagery brain computer interface control.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensory-guided human-machine joint learning accelerates the acquisition of motor imagery brain computer interface control.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) offer the potential to restore function and augment human capabilities. However, non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCIs still face challenges in learning efficiency and control precision, particularly for naïve users performing complex tasks. Here, we present a sensory-guided joint learning framework that integrates human motor learning with adaptive machine learning to improve BCI training and performance. In 31 BCI-naïve participants, the framework enabled rapid skill acquisition, achieving average online discrete accuracies of 86.0% for one-dimensional (1D) and 77.5% for two-dimensional (2D) motor imagery tasks, along with continuous control accuracies of 77.5% (1D) and 66.9% (2D). Mechanistically, tactile guidance reduced user exploration and accelerated neural adaptation, while sample reweighting aligned decoder updates with human learning trajectories. By coupling reinforcement-driven neural plasticity with adaptive algorithmic optimization, this framework advances BCI training from passive calibration to active human-machine joint learning, enabling practical and scalable neural interfaces for communication and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.