ArticleBDJ open2026
Student and staff experiences of digital dentistry in a Southwest Primary Care Dental School, UK.
Article in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDigital dentistry (DD) is increasingly integrated into clinical practice, yet limited research explores its implementation within undergraduate dental education in the UK. This study examined student and clinical supervisor (CS) experiences of digital intraoral scanning (DIOS) in a primary care dental school.
methodsA qualitative study using semi-structured online interviews was conducted with 15 Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) students and six CS in a dental school in Southwest England. Data were analysed using template analysis.
resultsParticipants viewed DIOS as essential for preparing graduates for contemporary practice, while maintaining competence in conventional techniques. Students described DIOS as engaging, low-stress, and beneficial for patient interaction, whereas CS highlighted technical challenges, variable staff digital literacy, and organisational constraints. Key barriers included limited equipment, restricted access, time pressures, and variability in supervisor training. Reported benefits included improved patient experience, accuracy, and enhanced learning for visually oriented students. Participants recommended increased access, structured training, and broader integration of digital technologies.
conclusionsDD teaching is positively received by students and valued by CS for preparing graduates for modern practice. However, successful integration requires investment in training, resources, and equitable access, alongside structured curriculum development to support consistent delivery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.