ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Integrating Suspect and Nontargeted Screening for Food Safety Testing: A Case Study of Bee Pollen Supplements.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural food supplements, including bee pollen supplements, are increasingly popular, yet they may hide safety issues arising from concentrated chemicals, ranging from natural toxins to anthropogenic contaminants. To assess their safety, methods are needed to chemically characterize both their exposome and metabolome. Hence, we developed and validated a nontargeted screening method based on liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (NTS LC-HRMS), combined with computational strategies to comprehensively annotate and simultaneously (semi)quantify contaminants and bioactive compounds in bee pollen. The method was validated for 15 target compounds spiked at 0.3-3 mg/kg in the bee pollen, including pesticides, pyrrolizidine alkaloids, and mycotoxins (log P range of -1.4 to 5). These compounds were accurately annotated using the developed nontargeted workflow (100% accuracy when MS2 data were acquired) and semiquantified with a mean prediction error of 2.42. Concurrently, the method successfully annotated more than 4000 compounds in bee pollen by integrating suspect screening and nontargeted screening approaches. These results demonstrate the robustness and added value of integrated targeted and nontargeted screening strategies applicable to complex food matrices, effectively replacing several matrix-specific targeted methods. Moreover, this comprehensive characterization provides crucial information for the next steps of the risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.