Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42457645›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026

Integrating Suspect and Nontargeted Screening for Food Safety Testing: A Case Study of Bee Pollen Supplements.

Susannah M Heeren, Nynke I Kramer, Laura Righetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susannah M HeerenLaboratory of Organic Chemistry, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen6708 EW, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-0617-2224
Nynke I KramerDivision of Toxicology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen6708 EW, The Netherlands.
Laura RighettiLaboratory of Organic Chemistry, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen6708 EW, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4238-0665

Funding

Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food Security and Nature KB56-002-003VLAG Graduate School NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural food supplements, including bee pollen supplements, are increasingly popular, yet they may hide safety issues arising from concentrated chemicals, ranging from natural toxins to anthropogenic contaminants. To assess their safety, methods are needed to chemically characterize both their exposome and metabolome. Hence, we developed and validated a nontargeted screening method based on liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (NTS LC-HRMS), combined with computational strategies to comprehensively annotate and simultaneously (semi)quantify contaminants and bioactive compounds in bee pollen. The method was validated for 15 target compounds spiked at 0.3-3 mg/kg in the bee pollen, including pesticides, pyrrolizidine alkaloids, and mycotoxins (log P range of -1.4 to 5). These compounds were accurately annotated using the developed nontargeted workflow (100% accuracy when MS2 data were acquired) and semiquantified with a mean prediction error of 2.42. Concurrently, the method successfully annotated more than 4000 compounds in bee pollen by integrating suspect screening and nontargeted screening approaches. These results demonstrate the robustness and added value of integrated targeted and nontargeted screening strategies applicable to complex food matrices, effectively replacing several matrix-specific targeted methods. Moreover, this comprehensive characterization provides crucial information for the next steps of the risk assessment.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood ContaminationFood SafetyMycotoxinsPollenAnimalsBeesLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryPesticidesPyrrolizidine AlkaloidsMycotoxinsPesticidesPyrrolizidine Alkaloids

Identifiers

PMID42457645
PMCPMC13425548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.