Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42457429›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Individually designed fall prevention strategies compared to generic strategies for mastering complex fall risk situations in people with multiple sclerosis: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Ylva Nilsagård, Ruzan Udumyan, Maria Halleberg Nyman, Anna Wäneskog

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07378566 (Digitally Supported Intervention to Master Complex Fall Risk Situations in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis - a Multicenter Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07378566 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Digitally Supported Intervention to Master Complex Fall Risk Situations in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis - a Multicenter Study (STAR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion Örebro CountyRan2026 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, FallArmsIndividual strategies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ylva NilsagårdUniversity Health Care Research Center, Örebro University Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro, Sweden ylva.nilsagard@oru.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9760-3785
Ruzan UdumyanClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Örebro University Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro, Örebro County, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9204-1165
Maria Halleberg NymanFaculty of Medicine and Health, University Healthcare Research Center, Örebro, Örebro County, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0460-3864
Anna WäneskogCenter for Innovation, Research and Education, Västerås Central Hospital, Västerås, Västmanland County, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2598-2317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOf individuals with mild-to-moderate multiple sclerosis (MS), 56% report falling at least once during a 3-month period. Several fall risk factors have been identified, but the issue is complex, with interactions between triggering factors and preceding activities and events. There is a lack of studies explicitly evaluating fall prevention strategies given as counselling over time. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The project includes (1) a two-armed randomised controlled internal pilot study with a nested qualitative study on participants' experiences and (2) a randomised controlled trial (RCT). The pilot study will evaluate feasibility in terms of recruitment, dropout, adverse events and battery of tests and will constitute a basis for recalculating the preliminary estimated sample size for a full-scale study. The RCT study will evaluate whether fall prevention strategies based on individual fall risk evaluation reduce fall frequency compared with general fall prevention information. Participants in the intervention group will have an extensive discussion with a physiotherapist regarding the impact of specific MS symptoms, environmental and personal factors, triggering factors and activities and/or circumstances that they perceive to precede fall situations; these discussions will then lead to the creation of individual strategies. In case of falling during follow-up, further discussions on strategies will be held by phone contact. The control group will receive general fall risk prevention recommendations. After completion of the study, the control group will be offered individual strategies based on reported falls. Participants in the pilot study allocated to the intervention group will after follow-up be invited to individual interviews focusing on experiences of taking part in the intervention and the study.Adults diagnosed with MS, fall history and remaining walking ability will be recruited by physiotherapists from six sites in Sweden. The primary outcome will be self-reported falls for 6 months and secondary outcomes will be self-rating scales covering concern about falling, confidence in remaining balance during activities, walking limitations and ability to avoid falls. Descriptive measures of disease impact will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority, Stockholm Dept. 4 (ID: 2025-04486-1, date: 2025-08-12). All participants will provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and relevant patient organisations.

trial registrationNCT07378566.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsMultiple SclerosisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPostural BalanceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignRisk Factorsfallsinterventionmultiple sclerosisphysiotherapyprevention

Identifiers

PMID42457429
PMCPMC13374452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.