Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42457396›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2026

Impact of reducing nicotine in cigarettes on mortality, economic costs and major depression in the USA.

Sarah Rivero Skolnick, Andrew F Brouwer, Chialing Cheng, Jamie Tam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah Rivero SkolnickRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, New Brusnwick, New Jersey, USA srskol@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5974-4344
Andrew F BrouwerEpidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3779-5287
Chialing ChengDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0228-5461
Jamie TamRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, New Brusnwick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-4259

Funding

Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Theodore Levy · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Prevention, Early Detection and Treatment InterventionsU01CA253858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, HOLFORD, THEODORE R · 2020 to 2025
$8.4M
Health and economic impact analysis of a reduced nicotine cigarette policy on vulnerable populationsK01DA056424 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie Pearl Tam · 2022 to 2026
$829k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253858NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA056424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe US Food and Drug Administration has proposed a product standard that would reduce the nicotine content and addictiveness of cigarettes. It is unclear what impact this would have on economic outcomes or priority populations who are disproportionately harmed by tobacco use, such as people with major depression (MD). We evaluated the long-term health and economic impacts of a nicotine product standard for the US population by MD status.

methodsWe developed and calibrated a microsimulation model using the National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2005-2023 data on smoking, e-cigarette use and MD episodes. We used this model to simulate a nicotine product standard from 2027 to 2100 based on the FDA's expert elicitation estimates of the policy's anticipated effects on smoking and vaping.

resultsUnder the proposed product standard, smoking is projected to decline to <1% for people with and without MD by 2040, resulting in 1.6 million premature deaths averted by 2100 and 8.0 million fewer cases of MD. Longer life expectancies under the policy are projected to increase medical costs by US$336 billion, while also increasing worker productivity by US$298 billion and consumer spending by US$1.3 trillion.

conclusionsTimely implementation of a nicotine reduction strategy, either through a federal product standard or state-level sales restrictions, is cost-effective and could prevent millions of premature deaths while reducing smoking disparities by MD status.

Indexed as

DisparitiesEconomicsNicotinePublic policy

Identifiers

PMID42457396
PMCPMC13540060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.