ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Creating change through short-term pilots and rapid cycle testing: a case of cardiovascular risk reduction.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the availability of safe, effective and low-cost diagnosis and treatment options for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and a significant decrease in death rates in the past several decades, ASCVD remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA. Scalable, evidence-based strategies have not achieved a level of success that optimally lowers cardiovascular risk. In this case study, we describe the first three years of the ASCVD Risk Reduction Initiative at a large academic health system, an effort to develop, evaluate and scale a heart disease prevention programme for patients whose modifiable risk remains high despite having access to care. The Initiative models a learning health system, combining traditional randomised controlled trials with quality improvement projects, iterative rapid cycle testing, data analyses, incorporation of learnings from concurrent projects at other institutions and user research to test a variety of approaches to cardiovascular risk reduction. This approach could be generalised to other important population health improvement challenges. In this article, we detail our pilot study process, results to date and challenges experienced in this example of care delivery innovation in action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.