ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Sadness regulation in daily life in remitted depression: Regulatory repertoire composition and affect-dependent effectiveness.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmotion regulation (ER) vulnerabilities that confer risk for depression and persist into remission remain poorly understood. Prior work in depression has primarily examined ER strategies independently, leaving unclear how much each strategy is used within an individual's regulatory repertoire (relative strategy use). We examined whether individuals with remitted depression (rMDD) differ from never-depressed healthy comparisons (HC) in relative strategy use and whether sadness mediates these differences. We also explored whether strategy effectiveness is attenuated in rMDD, particularly in moments of elevated sadness in daily life.
method86 young adults with rMDD and HC completed 7-day ecological momentary assessments (3×/day) of sadness and ER strategy use. Relative strategy use was calculated as each strategy's proportion of an individual's total strategy use across the week.
resultsRelative to HC, individuals with rMDD utilized a greater proportion of distraction and a lower proportion of reappraisal. Elevated sadness in individuals with rMDD mediated lower reappraisal proportional use. During moments of greater-than-usual sadness, distraction and reappraisal use predicted lower subsequent sadness in HC, whereas distraction predicted greater subsequent sadness in rMDD. Rumination exacerbated sadness for both groups, with stronger effects in rMDD under high sadness.
conclusionResults suggest a skewed ER portfolio in remitted depression characterized by a greater proportion of distraction and a lower proportion of reappraisal. Further, when individuals with rMDD experience elevated sadness, distraction becomes counterproductive and reappraisal provides no benefit. Findings suggest relative strategy use and affect-contingent strategy implementation may be useful targets for improving ER effectiveness and preventing recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.