ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026
Passive Screening for Depressive Symptoms Using Daily Wrist Actigraphy and Deep Learning: Model Development and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depressive symptoms are common yet often underrecognized in routine care, underscoring the need for scalable screening approaches beyond episodic self-report assessments. Wearable actigraphy can passively and continuously capture daily activity and 24-hour rest-activity rhythms associated with depressive symptom burden. However, the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models that leverage actigraphy data for depressive symptom screening remains insufficiently established. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate AI-based models for passive screening of depressive symptoms from daily wrist actigraphy data. Methods: We analyzed actigraphy recordings from 1160 Hispanic/Latino adults in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos who completed the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CESD-10), a self-reported depressive symptom screening scale. Multichannel actigraphy data, including activity counts, light exposure, and wake status, were used as inputs to 5 deep learning architectures to classify CESD-10-defined depressive symptom groups, comparing mild and higher symptoms with the normal group. Results: Actigraphy-derived behavioral markers differed across depressive symptom groups, showing lower daytime activity and altered circadian rest-activity organization with increasing symptom burden. Among the 5 deep learning architectures evaluated, the long short-term memory model consistently demonstrated the strongest overall discrimination. In held-out testing, the long short-term memory model achieved a macro-averaged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80, with the strongest discrimination observed for the higher depressive symptom group (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.889). These findings indicate improved model discrimination with increasing symptom severity, although false-positive rates remained notable across both classification tasks. Conclusions: Our study suggests that actigraphy-derived data can support AI-based classification of depressive symptoms. An actigraphy-based AI model may serve as a scalable, passive, and noninvasive complementary signal to aid early screening alongside traditional depressive symptom assessments before clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.