Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42456051›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026

Spatial Configuration of Pancreatic Cancer Is Associated with Disease Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative-Intent Resection.

Luis H Cisneros, Merih D Toruner, Zafar Siddiqui, Andrea V Maraone, Miranda Lin, Alex Xiao, Cornelius Thiels, Mark J Truty, Ben George, Khalid Jazieh and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Luis H CisnerosDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-1269
Merih D TorunerThe Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.ORCID 0000-0001-7447-8654
Zafar SiddiquiDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-2224
Andrea V MaraoneDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0002-0600-3299
Miranda LinDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-1250-1254
Alex XiaoDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-8929-9798
Cornelius ThielsDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3654-8601
Mark J TrutyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3776-527X
Ben GeorgeDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9667-9833
Khalid JaziehDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-3981-4293
Robb ScheelDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-8213-5288
Robert R McWilliamsDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-8199-5040
Carlo C MaleyArizona Cancer Evolution Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.ORCID 0000-0002-0745-7076
Chris HartleyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-2237-3102
Rofyda ElhalabyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-6990-8154
Paul DizonaDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0008-3481-3612
Qian ShiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-4640-8832
Martin E Fernandez-ZapicoDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-8089-3907
Ryan M CarrDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-5762-367X

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
The Role of the Microbiome in Cancer Suppression and Susceptibility Across SpeciesU54CA217376 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MALEY, CARLO · 2018 to 2022
$8.6M
The Ecology of Barrett's EsophagusR01CA285517 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MALEY, CARLO, YUAN, YINYIN · 2025 to 2025
$3.1M
Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) ADAPT ProgramCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic (CCaTS) UL1TR000135Gerstner Family FoundationNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NCI NIH HHS R01 CA285517NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently recurs after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) and curative-intent resection. Although major pathologic response predicts favorable outcomes, most patients achieve only minor response with a heterogeneous recurrence risk. We asked whether the spatial organization of residual PDAC encodes clinically relevant biology beyond residual tumor burden. EXPERIMENTAL

designIn a retrospective cohort of 203 patients with resected PDAC treated with NT and restricted to minor pathologic response, routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole-slide images were segmented into cancer and stroma using an artificial intelligence-enabled pipeline. Spatial composition (patch density, edge density) and configuration (compactness/complexity, intermixing) were quantified and tested for associations with disease-free survival (DFS) using multivariable models adjusted for standard clinicopathologic factors.

resultsShorter DFS was associated with a fragmented, interface-rich tumor-stroma ecology featuring higher edge density and diversity and reduced homotypic aggregation, independent of clinicopathologic variables. Two spatial risk models were independently prognostic: (i) cancer mean shape index plus stromal shape index variability [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.71; P = 0.003] and (ii) mean stromal patch area plus edge density (adjusted HR, 2.19; P = 0.002). Both models stratified outcomes in which pathologic response grading and residual cancer area did not. High-risk configurations were further associated with reduced intratumoral tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density and infiltration ratio, with relative TIL accumulation at the cancer periphery and within the stroma, consistent with an immune-excluded phenotype.

conclusionsResidual cancer-stroma topology quantified from standard H&E slides yields independent prognostic signals after NT in PDAC, provides a cellular immune correlate for spatial risk, and motivates prospective validation and spatially informed adjuvant strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm, ResidualProportional Hazards ModelsSpatial Analysis

Identifiers

PMID42456051
PMCPMC13525901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.