Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42455953›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Rethinking future flood hazard: Hourly data challenge daily flood projections in Alpine catchments.

Paul C Astagneau, Raul R Wood, Manuela I Brunner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul C AstagneauWSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos Dorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6688-5783
Raul R WoodWSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos Dorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4172-7719
Manuela I BrunnerWSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos Dorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8824-877X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study challenges a common misconception in current flood hazard research that floods will decrease under a warming climate in many rivers due to changes in land-surface processes, particularly decreases in snowmelt. This view persists because most studies on flood changes rely on daily resolution data, which masks flood changes due to subdaily rainfall intensification. We show that daily streamflow projections systematically underestimate flood changes compared with hourly projections in Alpine catchments. Our results highlight that the sign of change can even switch from negative to positive in strongly snow-influenced catchments when taking an hourly perspective because intensified subdaily precipitation can outweigh snowmelt decline. These results highlight that using daily instead of hourly projections may lead to wrong conclusions on both the magnitude and direction of flood changes. An hourly resolution perspective is, therefore, crucial to reliably guide adaptation strategies to extreme Alpine floods in a warming world.

Identifiers

PMID42455953
PMCPMC13371908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.