ArticlePLoS genetics2026
An ancestral transmembrane transcription factor couples cell envelope regulation and the SOS response in Caulobacter crescentus.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The DNA damage (SOS) response in bacteria involves derepression of a set of genes in order to activate mechanisms to tolerate stress, repair DNA and slow down cell division. While some of these genes are well characterized, many genes exist which are clearly induced by DNA damage but for which the function is unclear. In Caulobacter crescentus, the toxin-antitoxin (TA) system higBA and a closely associated downstream transcription factor (higX) are strongly induced as part of the SOS response, but the role of higX is unknown. We show that, unexpectedly, HigX functions independently of HigBA as a cell membrane-associated regulator and is toxic when overexpressed in filamentous cells. ChIP-Seq indicated that it binds to several promoters associated with cell envelope regulation. In cells with the SOS response constitutively activated, HigX was overproduced, but at the same time was unable to bind the majority of its target promoters. higX was conserved among many alpha-proteobacteria, while higBA was only found upstream of it in a small number of Caulobacter genomes, including the universal laboratory strain C. crescentus NA1000. Compositional analysis suggested that higBA originated from a foreign source, while higX is likely ancestral to the alpha-proteobacteria. Our data support a model where dysregulation of HigX production and activity in filamentous cells contributes to cell envelope instability and antibiotic sensitivity. Thus, the protective effect of inhibiting cell division during the SOS response in order to repair the DNA, carries the hidden cost of interference with HigX-mediated cell envelope maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.