Observational studyPloS one2026
Comparative clinical outcomes of polymyxin-based versus non-polymyxin regimens as definitive therapy in Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bacteraemia poses a major therapeutic challenge due to limited effective therapeutic options and high mortality. Although polymyxins remain widely used, emerging evidence suggests that non-polymyxin regimens may offer improved efficacy and safety. This study compared clinical and microbiological outcomes between polymyxin-based therapy (PBT) and non-polymyxin regimens (NPR) in patients with CRKP bloodstream infections (BSI).
methodsIn this multicentric, retrospective observational study, adult patients (≥18 years) with confirmed CRKP bacteraemia admitted between January 2019 and December 2023 were included. Patients were categorised based on definitive therapy as PBT or NPR. Baseline characteristics, disease severity, and outcomes were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were identified by multivariable Cox regression, validated by bootstrap resampling, and assessed through landmark sensitivity analysis excluding early deaths (<48 hours). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed for mortality and microbiological clearance.
resultsOf 1,009 patients with K. pneumoniae bacteraemia, 244 patients with CRKP met inclusion criteria (PBT, n = 143; NPR, n = 101). Baseline demographics were similar, but PBT recipients had higher SOFA (4[0-12] vs.3[0-12]; p < 0.001) and CCI scores (4[0-8] vs.3[0-10]; p = 0.025). Clinical cure was achieved more often with NPR (58.4%vs.15.4%; p = 0.02), while in-hospital mortality (38.6%vs.68.5%; p < 0.001) and acute kidney injury (28.7%vs.55.9%; p = 0.008) were significantly higher in the PBT group. Microbiological clearance and time to clearance were comparable. Independent predictors of mortality included treatment with polymyxins (aHR:1.595;95%CI:1.392-1.903;p = 0.015), SOFA score>6 (aHR:1.514;95%CI:1.285-1.928;p = 0.027), history of chronic liver disease (aHR:2.31;95%CI:1.884-3.642;p = 0.02), post-therapy dialysis (aHR:3.11;95%CI:1.008-4.59;p = 0.048), and requirement of ICU admission after definitive therapy (aHR:1.474;95%CI:1.252-1.891;p = 0.02). Survival analysis confirmed superior outcomes for NPR (log-rank p < 0.001).
conclusionNPR was associated with significantly higher clinical cure, lower nephrotoxicity, and reduced mortality compared with PBT regimens. These findings suggest that non-polymyxin regimens may be associated with improved clinical outcomes and lower nephrotoxicity compared with polymyxin-based therapy in patients with CRKP bacteraemia. Prospective studies were warranted to confirm these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.