ArticlePloS one2026
Machine learning-enhanced 3GPP channel modeling for 5G networks: A vendor-calibrated framework with cross-scenario validation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate channel characterization across diverse propagation environments is foundational to 5G network planning, yet existing machine learning approaches rarely integrate standardized 3GPP frameworks with vendor-specific equipment parameters. This study presents a regression-based framework combining 3GPP TR 38.901 channel models with five supervised learning algorithms-linear regression, polynomial regression (degree 2), support vector regression (SVR), decision tree, and artificial neural network (ANN)-trained on 10,000 deterministic samples spanning Urban Macro (UMa), Urban Micro (UMi), Rural Macro (RMa), and Indoor Hotspot (InH) scenarios at five carrier frequencies (0.7-60 GHz). Vendor-calibrated parameterization using authenticated Nokia AirScale 64T64R, Huawei AAU5940, and ZTE AAU 5G specifications grounds the simulated link budgets in commercial equipment characteristics, providing deployment-aligned (though formula-derived rather than field-measured) performance estimates (see Limitations). All five regression architectures are evaluated identically across all five carrier frequencies and all scenario types, enabling direct comparison under controlled conditions. For throughput prediction, the ANN and decision tree achieve the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.998, RMSE ≤ 24 Mbps averaged across five independent random splits; 95% CI: R2∈[0.997,0.999], RMSE ∈[19.1,22.4] Mbps), while linear and polynomial regressors show substantial error (R2≤0.56), reflecting the strongly nonlinear throughput surface. For path loss estimation under Urban Micro NLOS conditions, all models attain near-perfect fit (R2≈1.0, MSE < 0.02 dB2), confirming that simple regressors suffice for log-distance targets. Vendor link budgets quantify the Nokia-Huawei throughput gap (1.88× at 100 m) and the ZTE 28 GHz peak capacity (1688.6 Mbps at 100 m), establishing a breakeven inter-site distance of approximately 150 m below which FR2 outperforms FR1. Cross-scenario generalization experiments reveal a critical failure mode: models trained on LOS-urban data yield strongly negative R2 on Rural Macro scenarios (<-3), while mixed-scenario training recovers generalization to R2 > 0.75 across all environments. Permutation-based feature importance identifies distance as the dominant predictor (importance 0.65-0.85), with frequency importance rising to ≈0.40 at millimeter-wave bands. Sensitivity analysis confirms robustness (R2 > 0.90) under realistic parameter perturbations (±10% distance, ±5% frequency, ±2 dB EIRP). These results provide evidence-based guidelines for model selection, training data composition, and deployment in 5G/6G network planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.