Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42455826›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2026

Chronic disease related emergency department presentations and potential for redirection to alternative acute care settings ("FOCUS" study): A nationwide flashmob study.

Elisabeth M Mols, Michelle N Körnmann, Harm R Haak, Jelmer Alsma, Patricia M Stassen, Karin A H Kaasjager, Geert H Groeneveld, Marjolein N T Kremers, ORCA (Onderzoeks Consortium Acute Geneeskunde) Acute Medicine Research Consortium and Local Investigators

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elisabeth M MolsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Máxima MC, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0173-4060
Michelle N KörnmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Of Acute and General Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1889-552X
Harm R HaakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Máxima MC, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jelmer AlsmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2808-1514
Patricia M StassenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Karin A H KaasjagerDepartment of Acute Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Geert H GroeneveldDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Acute Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marjolein N T KremersDepartment of Health Services Research and CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care, Ageing and Long Term Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3791-8961
ORCA (Onderzoeks Consortium Acute Geneeskunde) Acute Medicine Research Consortium and Local Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Departments (EDs) face increasing pressure, driven in part by the complex needs of an ageing population. Many internal medicine ED visits may reflect complications of chronic conditions. Aiming to maintain the accessibility of acute care, evaluation whether such presentations can be managed in alternative settings is necessary.

methodsWe conducted a prospective multicentre flashmob study in 28 Dutch hospitals over a 24-hour period (November 28th and 29th, 2024). All adult non-elective ED patients presenting for internal medicine were included. Primary outcomes were the proportion of visits related to chronic conditions and the potential for redirection to an alternative acute care facility. Data on patient characteristics, case complexity, and organisational factors were collected and analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics.

resultsAmong 203 included patients, 45.3% presented with an acute complication of a chronic condition. Of these patients, 39.4% were receiving chronic care from an internist. Nearly one-quarter (24.1%) of all ED visits were considered preventable. Additionally, 39.9% of patients could have been managed in alternative settings such as acute outpatient clinics or directly to acute admission units. Despite the presence of these alternative care facilities in most hospitals, the lack of structural organisation was reported in 58.0% as a barrier to redirecting patients.

conclusionA substantial proportion of internal medicine patients at the ED reflect an acute on chronic care need. While alternative care pathways exist, organisational barriers hinder their use. Improving access to structured outpatient acute care could possibly reduce ED use and improve the efficiency of acute internal medicine services.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42455826
PMCPMC13372115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.