ArticlePloS one2026
Psychological wellbeing and its associated factors among older adults attending daycare centers in Kathmandu, Nepal: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological wellbeing (PWB) is a vital aspect of healthy aging, encompassing overall functioning, life satisfaction, and the ability to manage life's challenges. It is shaped by various socio-demographic, financial, and health-related factors. However, evidence on these associations among older adults in Nepal is limited. Accordingly, this study aimed to identify the level of PWB and its associated factors in this population. A cross-sectional analytical study was carried out among 300 older adults attending daycare centers in Kathmandu, Nepal. The respondents were selected using quota sampling based on the daycare centers. Subsequently, face-to-face interviews were conducted to collect data using structured interview schedules covering socio-demographic, financial, and health-related characteristics, as well as the Ryff PWB Scale. The collected data were then entered into Epi data software and analyzed using SPSS version 16. First, descriptive statistics were computed to summarize the sample characteristics and PWB, and subsequently, chi-square tests, and bivariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between the independent variables and PWB. Bivariate analysis shows that sex, marital status, offspring status, literacy status, former employment status, current employment status, pension status, and receipt of the old age allowance (OAA) were significantly associated with PWB. However, in multivariable logistic regression analysis, marital status, literacy status, former employment, and receipt of the OAA were significantly associated with PWB. Married older adults living with a spouse (AOR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.02-3.02), literate individuals (AOR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.18-3.82), and those with prior employment (AOR = 3.94, 95% CI: 1.36-11.36) had higher odds of high PWB, with p-value < .05. In contrast, OAA recipients had lower odds of high PWB (AOR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23-0.96, p = .037). Age, sex, and pension status were not significantly associated with PWB in the adjusted model. In conclusion, marital status, literacy status, former employment, and receipt of OAA were the factors associated with PWB. A holistic approach is recommended, including targeted interventions for illiterate older adults; those who are divorced, separated, unmarried, or widowed; those without formal employment history; and OAA recipients. Trial Registration: Not applicable. The authors clarify that this study employed a cross-sectional design, with data collected and analyzed at a single time point, and therefore it does not constitute a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.