ArticlePloS one2026
Using a co-design approach to develop aquatic reactive balance training for fall prevention.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFalls are a major health concern among older adults, leading to injury, reduced independence, and increased healthcare cost. Reactive balance training can reduce fall risk, but barriers such as fear, joint discomfort, and harness burden limit its use - barriers that training in aquatic environment may help overcome.
objectiveTo design an aquatic reactive balance training (AquaReBal) program for older adults, integrating end-user perspectives to enhance safety, accessibility, and engagement.
methodsUsing a participatory design approach grounded in Participatory Action Research principles, we engaged three older adult partners, physiotherapists, and researchers in iterative phases including literature review, stakeholder consultations, practical pool sessions, and feedback meetings. Data collected through online meetings, surveys, field notes, and observations were reviewed using an inductive qualitative content analysis approach to inform iterative refinement of the intervention, following the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 framework.
resultsThree older adult partners and a multidisciplinary team co-designed the AquaReBal protocol through two participatory design sessions, one practical pool session, and two internal team sessions. Key recommendations from partners included using a vest instead of a hip belt for perturbations, addressing pool depth visibility, and creating an introductory package with practical information for participants. Partners emphasized safety, instructor support, and social engagement as critical for adherence and satisfaction.
conclusionThe co-design process enabled the development of an AquaReBal protocol tailored to older adults' needs and preferences, providing initial insights relevant to future feasibility and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.