ArticlePloS one2026
Tail risk, large fluctuations and downfalls in renewable energy markets.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The renewable energy sector has expanded rapidly as countries pursue decarbonization goals, increasing investor exposure to market risk and extreme price movements. While prior research has examined downside risk, volatility, and dependence structures in clean energy markets, less is known about the statistical properties governing the decay of extreme returns and the existence of finite moments. This study addresses this gap by analyzing the heavy-tailed behavior of renewable and conventional energy equity indices using daily data from April 2005 to February 2025. We estimate tail indices to assess the degree of heavy-tailedness and to infer the existence of finite moments, relying on confidence-interval-based inference rather than point estimates. In addition to full-sample analysis, a recursive expanding-window approach is employed to examine the time variation of tail risk and its response to major market stress events. The results indicate that both renewable and conventional energy indices exhibit heavy-tailed return distributions consistent with power-law behavior. Confidence-interval-based inference supports the existence of finite first and second moments across all indices, while higher-order moments may be infinite, implying limitations for models that rely on skewness or kurtosis. The recursive analysis reveals pronounced increases in tail risk during periods of systemic stress, particularly during the global financial crisis, highlighting the state-dependent nature of extreme risk in energy markets. Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of statistically justified tail analysis for risk measurement, portfolio construction, and stress testing in renewable energy markets, complementing existing studies focused on volatility and dependence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.