ArticlePloS one2026
Recognition of unfamiliar predators in domestic horses through only visual predator cues.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acoustic, olfactory, and visual predator cues trigger various adaptive responses among a variety of prey species even when they are under human protection since birth. Previous studies have found that domesticated animals show increased vigilance, stress, flight, and aggregation behaviors in response to predation threats. These investigations, however, did not directly test visual threatening cues alone in animals that communicate more with body language than vocalizations while considering individual temperament and social status. The current study aims to address this issue. Eighteen horses housed at the Ohio State University Equine Center with mixed age and sex were the subjects of the experiments (mean age = 7 years). The horses were shown affiliative and aggressive behaviors of a pack of wolves (unfamiliar predator) and grazing wombats (unfamiliar non-predator) on a projector without any acoustic cues while their reactions were recorded with an equine heart monitor and camera. Data were also collected on assessments of anxiety/fear, social dependency, and social status in the herd. Results showed that domestic horses distinguished an unfamiliar predator from an unfamiliar non‑predator based on visual cues alone, showing significantly higher heart rate (HR) responses to wolf videos than to wombat videos (P = 0.0022). HR also increased relative to baseline during wolf videos (P = 0.0005), whereas HR during wombat videos did not differ from baseline (P = 0.28). There were no significant differences in HR responses to affiliative vs. aggressive behaviors displayed by wolves (P = 0.4033). The age of the horses was negatively associated with fearfulness (P = 0.0048) and social dependency (P = 0.0076). Male horses showed a more heightened HR to unfamiliar predator cues compared to females (P = 0.0088). High social status was associated with an increased HR response to unfamiliar predator stimuli (P = 0.033) but was unrelated to control stimulus HR (P = 0.26), baseline HR (P = 0.32), fearfulness (P = 0.26), social dependency (P = 0.85), age (P = 0.42), and sex (P = 0.61). Lateralized gaze revealed a near total absence of left eye viewing across all stimuli, with no difference between right gaze and binocular look durations for wolves (P = 0.83). In contrast, horses showed a significant binocular preference over right-gaze when viewing wombats (P < 0.0001). These results demonstrate that, based on visual cues alone, horses exhibit physiological alertness toward potential predatory threats while responding to non-threatening stimuli with exploratory gaze behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.