ArticlePloS one2026
Neotaphonomic characteristics of vertebrate site formation in underwater caves.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recovering well-preserved vertebrate remains from underwater caves has provided critical insights into archaeological and palaeontological records worldwide. However, understanding how bone assemblages form and are modified in underwater environments remains limited due to stable low energy burial conditions that produce time-averaged deposits, and underwater settings that hinder traditional recording and recovery methods. We examine three assemblages of historically deposited and dated non-human, domesticate animal bones from two underwater caves, Green Waterhole and Gouldens Sinkhole, near Mount Gambier, South Australia, encompassing known submerged (wet) and dry burial conditions. The assemblages were examined to assess how wet and dry cave environments impact bone distribution, surface and microstructural modification. Radiocarbon dating of 41 specimens indicates that domesticate fauna were deposited over decadal and centennial timescales, allowing taphonomic signatures to be contextualised through time. Statistically significant differences were identified between wet and dry burial contexts. Bones recovered from wet contexts exhibit mostly better preservation, including skeletal elemental completeness, surface, and microstructure, than those from dry caves. However, some of the submerged specimens also have elevated frequencies of bone surface chemical corrosion with macroscopic evidence for heterogenous black biological staining, algal or biofilm attack, and a distinctive form of circular etching. Histotaphonomy further reveals patterns of peripheral cyanobacterial tunnelling across most bones recovered from submerged contexts. Bones from dry environments were dominated by terrestrially linked tunnelling across all regions of the bone cortex. These findings can be explained by variation in light availability across different cave zones which influences biological activity and, in turn, the expression of taphonomic markers on bone externally and at the microstructural level. This is the first study to provide a benchmark dataset for reconstructing depositional histories and post-depositional reworking of bones in underwater cave environments under a taphonomic framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.