ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2026
Wavefront sensing at a high-repetition-rate X-ray free-electron laser.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wavefront characterization is essential for diagnosing, interpreting and mitigating performance limitations at X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs). However, the dramatic increase in thermal load and data throughput at high repetition rates makes established wavefront characterization methods difficult to implement effectively. Here, we demonstrate that X-ray speckle arising from beamline optics can enable fast, robust and sensor-free wavefront metrology at next-generation XFEL facilities. Combining this approach with a statistical formulation of X-ray speckle tracking, we quantify local wavefront fluctuations within pulse trains at the European XFEL. We find that shot-to-shot wavefront fluctuations are predominantly planar phase tilts with distinct statistical signatures across intra- and inter-train timescales. The dominant source of wavefront error is periodic at frequencies consistent with known mechanical oscillation modes of the photon transport optics, while intra-train fluctuations correlate with instabilities in the electron bunch trajectory. Our results establish a practical framework for high-repetition-rate wavefront characterization and diagnostics at next-generation XFELs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.