Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42455571›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Area-Based Marginalization and Incidence of Childhood Cancer.

Maria Chiu, Felicia Leung, Jamie Rohde, Paul Gibson, Donna Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria ChiuPediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Felicia LeungPediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jamie RohdeFaculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul GibsonPediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Donna JohnstonPediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Childhood cancer is a leading cause of disease-related mortality, with increasing incidence in many high-income countries. Socioeconomic disparities in childhood cancer survival are well documented, but less is known about incidence. Objective: To examine associations between area-based deprivation and childhood cancer incidence in a universal health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cross-sectional study linked data from the population-based Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System cancer registry with Statistics Canada's postal code and Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-Marg) databases to identify pediatric cancer cases diagnosed in Ontario from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2023, among approximately 2.3 million children aged 0 to 14 years living in Ontario, Canada. Data analysis was performed from October 2025 to February 2026. Exposures: ON-Marg dimensions: material resources (income and educational attainment), households and dwellings (residential instability), age and labor force (dependents and adults not in the labor force), and racialized and newcomer populations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Crude and age-standardized incidence rates for each ON-Marg dimension; incidence rate ratios were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression models adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis period for the overall population and stratified by cancer subtype (ie, leukemia and lymphoma, central nervous system tumors, and other non-central nervous system solid tumors). Results: Of the 9063 pediatric cancer cases (4981 [55.0%] male; median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 5 [2-10] years), the age-standardized incidence rate was 162.7 cases per million (95% CI, 159.3-166.1). Most cancer cases were found in areas with the greatest concentration of racialized and newcomer populations; however, after accounting for population size, there was no difference in cancer incidence across quintiles. A key finding of this study was that the least marginalized quintiles of material resources (incidence rate ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.22) and households and dwellings (incidence rate ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16) had significantly higher incidence rates compared with the most marginalized quintiles. These findings were driven primarily by hematologic and other solid cancer types. Conclusion and Relevance: This large population-based cross-sectional study with virtually complete ascertainment of pediatric cancer cases in a Canadian province with a universal health care system found higher cancer incidence among children who lived in affluent and residentially stable neighborhoods. These findings underscore the importance of considering sociodemographic factors when examining pediatric cancer epidemiology; more research is needed to understand the mechanisms driving these differences, their impact on outcomes, and how the findings may inform targeted prevention and intervention strategies.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOntarioRegistriesSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID42455571
PMCPMC13373664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.