ReviewJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2026
Defining Healthy Weight Loss and Target Weight in the Era of Highly Effective Treatment of Patients With Obesity.
Review in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHighly effective anti-obesity medications (AOMs) induce substantial weight loss and have renewed debate on appropriate treatment targets. Weight loss comprises reductions in fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM), with skeletal muscle (SM) as the major component of FFM. Clinical trials report that 20%-40% of total weight loss is attributable to FFM, raising concerns about excessive SM loss and sarcopenia risk.
methodsThis narrative review integrates physiological principles and quantitative data from clinical trials to derive a rationale for redefining healthy weight loss targets based on body composition. Determinants of energy partitioning (baseline adiposity, age, diet and physical activity) are combined with predictive and reference-based approaches. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was estimated from FFM, body weight, sex and age (R
resultsSM accounts for 92%-97% of FFM loss during weight reduction. In incretin-based trials, FM decreased by -18.7% to -33.9% and FFM by -6.8% to -10.9%, corresponding to 33%-38% of total weight loss. Model-based estimates predict lower FFM reductions (~6.8%-6.9%), indicating that observed FFM losses exceed physiological expectations under conditions of large energy deficits. Across studies, diet- or AOM-induced weight loss without structured exercise is associated with higher proportions of FFM loss than expected, whereas interventions including exercise show more favourable partitioning. An SMI-SDS threshold of -0.67 (25th percentile) identifies clinically relevant SM depletion.
conclusionsDisproportionate SM loss is common with considerable weight reduction and may exceed physiologically expected levels. An SMI-based framework enables definition of individualized, safe treatment targets and may help prevent sarcopenia during obesity treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.