ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Evaluation of the Quality of Online Resources for Scanxiety: YouTube and Major Websites.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scans constitute an important role in cancer management. "Scanxiety", or scan-associated anxiety, is commonly experienced by patients undergoing cancer-related scans. Although more patients are turning to the internet and social media platforms such as YouTube for health information, few studies have evaluated the scanxiety content presented in these online resources. This study aims to evaluate YouTube videos and webpages available to patients relating to scanxiety. YouTube was searched using pre-defined scanxiety search terms and a Google search analysis for the term scanxiety was carried out and results from the first two pages were collected in August 2024. YouTube videos and webpages were evaluated using the validated DISCERN quality criteria for consumer health information and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). To assess accessibility of reading content, the Flesch-Kincaid reading level was determined for each webpage. Three independent reviewers performed video and webpage analysis. There were 82 videos and 18 webpages included in the analysis. Videos had a mean independent-reviewer rated quality DISCERN score of 1.8 out of 5, which was between low and moderate quality. Websites showed a higher mean quality DISCERN score of 2.7 out of 5. Despite better quality of information, websites were written at a higher reading level than that of the general population, limiting accessibility. Both videos and webpages had low actionability as patient education materials. Efforts are needed to improve scanxiety-related patient education as the number of patients living with cancer and requiring cancer-related scans has significantly increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.