ArticleEcoHealth2026
Predicting climate-driven urban rat release and associated risks across climate zones.
Article in EcoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban rat populations are widely assumed to increase under climate change, largely due to recent studies. This narrative is often extended to cities worldwide, irrespective of their local climate. Yet, this oversimplification obscures complex ecological and social processes that shape commensal rat dynamics. Here, we synthesize evidence across rodent ecology, epidemiology, urbanization, and human behavior to propose a multi‑dimensional framework for urban rat‑release: a climate‑mediated relaxation of seasonal constraints that reduces winter burrow confinement and increases above‑ground activity, dispersal, apparency, and reproductive output in cold‑temperate cities, often producing short‑term population increases before density‑dependent processes stabilize numbers. Warming winters may extend breeding windows and increase winter food availability, but these effects interact with expanding arthropod vectors, shifting pathogen pressures, and the compounding forces of urban architecture, waste management systems, and human activity. Human social responses-sanitation reforms, surges in panic‑driven control, and predictable political attention cycles-can either magnify or suppress populations, often more strongly than ecological factors. We argue that climate change will not produce uniform increases in rat abundance; instead, outcomes will vary predictably across cold‑temperate, mild‑temperate, and tropical cities depending on the alignment of these interacting dimensions. Importantly, rat populations may stabilize or surge depending on how disease dynamics, density-dependent constraints, and public responses converge. This framework provides a foundation for forecasting models and offers practical guidance for urban planning, public health, and policy development in warming climates where rats and vectors reshape urban risks. These dynamics align with the One Health perspective, which emphasizes the interdependence of human, animal, and environmental systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.