Observational studyIndian journal of pediatrics2026
Feasibility of Enteral Nutrition in Pediatric Septic Shock at a Tertiary Center in Vietnam.
Observational study in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility and clinical characteristics of early enteral nutrition (EN), defined as initiation within 48 h of PICU admission, in children with septic shock, and to describe clinical characteristics and outcomes according to timing of EN in a resource-limited setting.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at a national tertiary pediatric intensive care unit in Vietnam. Children aged 1 mo to 16 y diagnosed with septic shock were categorized into early EN (≤48 h) and late EN (>48). Baseline characteristics, illness severity, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed as exploratory approaches to adjust for confounding.
resultsAmong 52 patients, 22 (42.3%) received early EN. Patients in the early EN group had lower baseline illness severity. Early EN was successfully implemented in a substantial proportion of patients without observed severe gastrointestinal complications. Lower mortality and more favorable outcomes, including fewer days of mechanical ventilation and reduced need for renal replacement therapy, were observed in the early EN group. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the retrospective design, small sample size, and potential confounding by indication.
conclusionsEarly enteral nutrition was feasible and appeared safe in children with septic shock, even in a resource-limited PICU setting. While favorable outcomes were observed, the study does not establish causality, and further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455466What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.