ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Real-world evaluation of primary prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with triplet therapy.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTriplet therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), docetaxel, and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors improves outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), but hematologic toxicity remains a major concern. The role of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in real-world practice remains unclear. We evaluated its impact on toxicity and treatment delivery.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter cohort study included 121 patients with mCSPC treated with ADT, docetaxel, and darolutamide across eight institutions (February 2023-December 2025). Primary G-CSF use was at physician discretion. Adverse events were graded per CTCAE v5.0. Relative cumulative dose (RCD) of docetaxel and febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence were assessed. Logistic regression identified factors associated with severe toxicity.
resultsPrimary G-CSF was independently associated with reduced risk of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (OR 0.087; 95% CI 0.030-0.25; p < 0.001) and FN (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.030-0.78; p = 0.022). Without prophylaxis, grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and FN occurred in 64.9% and 23.4%, respectively, mostly during cycle 1. Primary G-CSF did not significantly improve overall RCD; however, patients with FN had lower RCD (80.0% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.035) and were less likely to achieve RCD > 80% (45.0% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.009). Docetaxel discontinuation was lower with primary G-CSF (p = 0.032).
conclusionPrimary prophylactic G-CSF was associated with reduced hematologic toxicity, while FN was strongly linked to impaired treatment delivery. Early G-CSF use may help prevent hematologic toxicity, particularly in patients at high risk of FN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.