ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
FDA Accelerated Approval Disclosures on Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Websites: Testing Presence, Prominence, and Wording.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides a pathway, known as accelerated approval, intended to facilitate and expedite development and review for prescription drugs that treat serious or life-threatening illnesses such as cancer. Many direct-to-consumer websites for accelerated approval prescription drugs include a disclosure describing concepts related to accelerated approval, such as the basis of the approval, uncertainty about clinical benefits of the drug, and the need for confirmatory clinical trials. The current research examined the presence, wording, and prominence of an accelerated approval disclosure on a prescription drug website.
methodsWe conducted two studies with different populations: Study 1 participants were 822 general population US adults. Study 2 participants were 615 US adult cancer patients and caregivers. In each study, we randomly assigned participants to view one of five versions of a website for a fictitious acute lymphoblastic leukemia prescription drug. The control website did not include the disclosure about accelerated approval. The four disclosure conditions varied by disclosure prominence (low vs. high) and disclosure wording (consumer-friendly vs. based on the physician labeling and disclosures in the real-world marketplace).
resultsIn comparison to a disclosure based on physician labeling, a consumer-friendly disclosure helped participants understand accelerated approval concepts. For example, more participants in the consumer-friendly disclosure than in the physician-labeling disclosure condition knew the drug has not been shown to help patients live longer (Study 1: 13.4% vs. 31.4%; Study 2: 12.2% vs. 34.4%). Comparisons with the control condition demonstrated that while including either the physician-labeling or consumer-friendly disclosure increased participants' awareness of the disclosure, only the presence of the consumer-friendly disclosure improved comprehension of accelerated approval concepts. There were few effects for increasing prominence of the disclosure.
conclusionsAdding a consumer-friendly disclosure to promotional websites may help consumers, patients, and caregivers understand a prescription drug's accelerated approval status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.