SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2026
Safety and efficacy of silicone intubation compared to standard techniques in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) is a lacrimal drainage disorder, commonly seen in adults. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is a widely adopted surgical procedure for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Silicon intubation is a technique, which involves inserting a soft silicone stent to keep the ostium patent post operatively.
methodsThis meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, with searches across 4 databases. Primary outcomes were overall success rate, and overall failure rate. Secondary outcomes included granulations/intracanalicular obstruction (ICO) threats, hemorrhage, anatomical failure, functional failure, recurrent symptoms/epiphora, and cicatricial stenosis/post-procedural restenosis. Data were analyzed using R software version 4.3. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I
resultsFrom 3,974 studies initially, 20 studies were selected in the final review, in which 17 were RCTs and 3 observational studies. A statistically significant improvement in surgical success rates, while reducing failure rates were observed in the silicone intubation (stented) group compared to the unstented group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of restenosis, hemorrhage, functional failure, epiphora or recurrent symptoms. Reduction of anatomical failure was observed. Increase in adverse effects of granulation tissue formation and internal canalicular obstruction were observed. Heterogeneity was low and no publication bias was detected in outcomes.
conclusionsSilicone intubation during mechanical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) was associated with improved success and patency rates, as well as lower failure rate. While more resource-intensive, it provides a slightly higher advantage, particularly in recurrent or revision instances, recommending its implementation in routine EN-DCR where possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.