Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42455404›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2026

New trends and approaches in the voltammetric analysis of gunshot residue.

Gökhan Uzun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gökhan UzunAnkara Regional Criminal Police Laboratory Directorate, Ankara, Turkey. uzungokhan5@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9425-0446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gunshot residue (GSR) analysis remains a central technique of firearm-related forensic investigations; however, the current gold-standard technique, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS), is constrained by high cost, limited portability, and laboratory dependence. These limitations have driven increasing interest in electrochemical and voltammetric approaches as rapid, cost-effective, and field-deployable alternatives capable of detecting both inorganic (IGSR) and organic (OGSR) components. This review examines developments reported between 2000 and 2026, with particular emphasis on nanomaterial-modified screen-printed electrodes, advanced voltammetric techniques (including square-wave and differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry), and their application to the simultaneous determination of key metallic markers (Pb, Sb, Ba) and organic compounds such as nitroglycerin, nitrocellulose, and diphenylamine. Emerging strategies involving microfluidic integration, hybrid electrochemical-optical platforms, and chemometric data analysis are also evaluated in the context of improving sensitivity, selectivity, and on-site applicability. Importantly, this review extends beyond analytical performance by situating current methodologies within a probabilistic evidence-evaluation framework based on likelihood ratios and Bayesian inference, an aspect largely overlooked in prior literature. Persistent challenges, including matrix interferences, electrode fouling, and the lack of standardized forensic validation protocols, are discussed alongside the requirements for reliable operational deployment.

Indexed as

Electrochemical sensorsForensic electrochemistryGunshot residueNanomaterialsScreen-printed electrodesVoltammetry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.