ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Long-term optical and physical stability of resin composites: the role of MDP-containing adhesive as a modeling liquid.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate how a modeling liquid and an MDP-containing adhesive affect the surface roughness, water sorption/solubility, and optical stability of a nano-hybrid resin resin composite. MATERIALS AND
methodsA nano-hybrid resin composite was divided into three groups: control (no modeling agent), GC Modeling Liquid (ML), and Clearfil SE Bond (SB). Surface roughness (Ra) was measured before and after simulated brushing. Water sorption and solubility were tested per ISO 4049. Color stability and translucency were measured spectrophotometrically at baseline and after 1, 7, and 28 days of immersion in staining solutions. Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests (p < 0.05).
resultsThe tested modeling agents reduced initial surface roughness; however, this advantage was lost after brushing. While water sorption was similar across groups, the SB group showed significantly lower solubility. After 28 days, both ML and SB groups resisted coffee staining. In red wine, the SB group exhibited superior color stability and, unlike others, showed no significant loss of translucency.
conclusionThe chemical composition of a modeling agent appears to be more critical for long-term stability than its initial effect on surface texture. The tested MDP-containing adhesive formulation may contribute to reduced solubility and improved optical stability under the conditions of this study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The selection of a modeling agent based on its chemical composition, rather than handling alone, is a key strategy. An MDP-containing adhesive improves the long-term optical integrity and durability of restorations, especially in challenging clinical situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455394What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.