ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026
A simple algebraic expression can determine if a drug's clearance is non-specific or target-mediated.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Target-mediated drug distribution (TMDD) is typically classified by accelerated removal of drug after serum concentration drops below a critical level. Susceptible drugs would be dosed to a schedule that maintains exposure above this level, where concentration drops monoexponentially. Out-dosing TMDD often implies that target binding is saturated or degraded. T-cell engagers and other biologics are often given with low dosages which make out-dosing TMDD unrealistic, yet are also typically observed to have monoexponential elimination. It can be challenging to determine whether such a concentration-time relationship is due to TMDD or standard non-specific (intrinsic) routes of clearance, and more so to scale this clearance from preclinical settings, as TMDD-driven clearance may not scale allometrically like intrinsic clearance. In this work, we derived an algebraic expression for the proportion of clearance that is target-mediated or intrinsic, which requires only the intrinsic half-life and the target receptor's concentration, turnover rate and binding affinity for the drug. We further show that the typical transition from monoexponential decline of serum concentrations to accelerated, target-driven clearance occurs at concentrations given by two expressions in those same parameters. We apply the equations to published data for monoclonal antibodies and T-cell engagers, finding that we consistently characterize their clearance as expected. These expressions can be used to determine if a drug's clearance would be expected to be driven by target-mediated or non-specific routes at pharmacologically active concentrations, and hence how to accurately translate pharmacokinetic properties from preclinical species to human, a process that is essential for drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.