Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42455359›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

Contrasting the classic effect of reward on attentional priority maps: behavioral evidence for an attentional gating of spatially-specific reward signals.

Bertrand Beffara, Fadila Hadj-Bouziane, Suliann Ben Hamed, Irene Cristofori, Leslie Tricoche, C Nico Boehler, Leonardo Chelazzi, Elisa Santandrea, Emiliano Macaluso

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bertrand BeffaraInstitute of Cognitive Science Marc Jeannerod, CNRS / UMR 5229, Bron, 69500, France. bertrand.beffara@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9288-3597
Fadila Hadj-BouzianeCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL), CNRS, INSERM, Bron, France.
Suliann Ben HamedInstitute of Cognitive Science Marc Jeannerod, CNRS / UMR 5229, Bron, 69500, France.
Irene CristoforiInstitute of Cognitive Science Marc Jeannerod, CNRS / UMR 5229, Bron, 69500, France.
Leslie TricocheUniversité Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, 69100, France.
C Nico BoehlerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Leonardo ChelazziDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elisa SantandreaDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Emiliano MacalusoUniversité Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, 69100, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-HBPR-0002-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The control of selective visuo-spatial attention is known to rely on multiple signals, including reward. While most attention control signals are well acknowledged to interact with each other, the case of reward has led to mixed findings supporting either its interaction with, or its independence from other signals. We addressed this issue using a 4-item search task that entailed spatially biased reward contingencies, with one of the four locations associated with high rewards for correct target discriminations. In different conditions, the target, a distractor or neither of them could be physically salient. Targets at the high-reward location did not enhance search performance. In contrast, and contrary to our initial expectations, salient distractors at the high-reward location interfered less with the discrimination of the task-relevant targets, reflecting gating mechanisms at the high-reward location. Exploratory analyses showed that, across participants, the degree of target and salient distractor gating at the high-reward location correlated with each other. In contrast to previous findings supporting attention capture by reward signals, we evidenced gating by reward.

Indexed as

AttentionRewardSpace PerceptionAdultDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.