ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2026
[Experiences of glaucoma patients : Evaluation of the survey conducted by the Federal Association Glaucoma Self-help and the DOG Glaucoma Section].
Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlaucoma is one of the most frequent causes of blindness worldwide, including in Germany; however, it is unclear whether all those affected are sufficiently informed about their condition, possible treatment and their side effects.
objectiveSurvey of glaucoma patients to assess the level of awareness about the disease and its treatment.
methodsThe questionnaire consisted of 11 specific questions that asked about education and satisfaction with treatment for glaucoma. It was developed by the Federal Association Glaucoma Self-help (Bundesverband Glaukom-Selbsthilfe e. V). in collaboration with the Glaucoma Section of the German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG) and made available to members of the association as well via the website and patient forums and in waiting rooms.
resultsA total of 334 glaucoma patients participated in the survey between July 2024 and June 2025. Of the respondents 15.5% stated that they were very well informed, while 40.1% reported they had been inadequately informed. There was a lack of information on treatment options and side effects as well as on the prescribed eye drops. Patients therefore sought alternative sources of information (e.g., the internet). Results were also mixed when it came to information about treatment use and side effects and 89.5% said they knew how to use their treatment. Approximately 50% were able to discuss changes to their treatment or information about alternative treatments with their doctor.
conclusionThe findings from this survey should be used to develop more targeted patient education strategies in the future. Patient-centered understandable and continuous education should be a central component of treatment. This would contribute to improved adherence and thus also to the quality of life of those affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455350What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.