Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42455318›Full record

ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026

Influence of bisphosphonate pretreatment on bone mineral density gains and fracture outcomes with teriparatide: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rimesh Pal, Mainak Banerjee, Urmila Yadav, Shinjan Patra, Sanjay K Bhadada

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rimesh PalDepartment of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India. rimesh.ben@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4859-9393
Mainak BanerjeeDepartment of Endocrinology, Ramakrishna Mission Seva Pratishthan Vivekandanda Institute of Medical Sciences, Kolkata, 700026, India.
Urmila YadavDepartment of Paediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Shinjan PatraDepartment of Endocrinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, 741245, India.
Sanjay K BhadadaDepartment of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTeriparatide is a potent anabolic therapy for osteoporosis and is frequently prescribed after prior bisphosphonate (BP) treatment in routine clinical practice. Whether such pretreatment alters teriparatide efficacy, particularly with respect to fracture outcomes, remains uncertain.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251234859). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to November 30, 2025. Randomized trials, non-randomized trials, observational studies, and post hoc or subgroup analyses comparing teriparatide efficacy in BP-pretreated versus BP-naïve individuals were included. Outcomes included percentage change in areal bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, hip, and femoral neck, and incident fractures. Random-effects models with Hartung-Knapp adjustment were used.

resultsFifteen studies involving 8,763 BP-pretreated and 7,071 BP-naïve individuals were analysed. Prior BP exposure was associated with a significantly smaller increase in lumbar spine BMD following teriparatide (mean difference [MD] -2.21%; 95% CI -4.17,-0.25; p = 0.027). No significant differences were observed at the hip (MD -0.88%; 95% CI -1.98,0.19; p = 0.108) or femoral neck (MD -0.52%; 95% CI -1.36,0.33; p = 0.230). Pooling of absolute fracture events suggested a higher fracture risk in BP-pretreated patients (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.09,1.88; p = 0.009), whereas pooled adjusted hazard ratios did not show a statistically significant difference (HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.99,1.83; p = 0.055).

conclusionsPrior bisphosphonate exposure is associated with modest, site-specific attenuation of lumbar spine BMD gains with teriparatide, without significant effects at non-spinal sites. Available fracture data remain inconclusive and adjusted analyses, albeit based on only two studies, do not indicate a clear attenuation of fracture protection. Prior bisphosphonate exposure may attenuate teriparatide response, but its clinical relevance is unclear. In this meta-analysis, lumbar spine BMD gains were modestly reduced, while hip/femoral neck BMD and adjusted fracture outcomes were not significantly affected. These findings support the continued use of teriparatide either before or after bisphosphonates when clinically indicated.

Indexed as

Bisphosphonate pretreatmentBMDFracture outcomesTeriparatide

Identifiers

PMID42455318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.