ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Prophylaxis and management of thromboembolism in pnh patients: an italian survey.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by uncontrolled complement-mediated intravascular hemolysis and a disproportionately high thromboembolic risk. Although terminal complement inhibition (CIT) has substantially modified the disease course, reducing thromboembolic events (TE), the residual risk remains elevated and evidence-based anticoagulation guidelines are lacking. To characterize real- world practice, we conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional survey involving 24 Italian Centers caring for 291 patients, evaluating strategies for primary antithrombotic prophylaxis (PAP), secondary prophylaxis (SAP), and management of breakthrough hemolysis (BTH). Marked heterogeneity emerged. PAP prior to CIT was routinely employed in only one-third of Centers, whereas an equal proportion did not use it; the remainder adopted risk-based approaches integrating thrombophilia traits or clone size. SAP was universally administered after TE, with 75% of Centers maintaining indefinite anticoagulation regardless of CIT response. Anticoagulation during BTH was likewise variable, with LMWH as the preferred agent and duration largely dictated by biochemical resolution. These findings demonstrate substantial inter-center variability, underscoring the lack of harmonized national frameworks. The results highlight the need for structured expert consensus and standardized clinical algorithms to optimize thrombosis prevention and management in PNH in the era of complement inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.