ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
Self-Efficacy and Self-Esteem Predict Return to Work and Buffer the Impact of Treatment Duration: A Longitudinal Panel Study.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReturn to work (RTW) is a key outcome of occupational rehabilitation, but physical recovery alone does not determine it. While prolonged treatment duration is a known barrier to RTW, the extent to which modifiable psychological resources mitigate this effect remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether self-efficacy and self-esteem are associated with RTW and whether self-esteem buffers the adverse effect of prolonged treatment duration.
methodsFive-year panel data (2018-2022) from the Panel Study of Workers' Compensation Insurance, including 14,607 observations, were analyzed. RTW was operationalized as current work participation at each survey wave based on the official PSWCI economic activity status classification. Generalized estimating equations with a logit link were used to examine main and interaction effects. A Random Forest model was used to assess predictive performance and variable importance.
resultsSelf-efficacy (OR = 2.020, p < .001) and self-esteem (OR = 1.519, p = .001) significantly predicted RTW, with self-efficacy showing the strongest effect. Longer treatment duration was associated with reduced probability of RTW (OR = 0.615, p < .001). A significant interaction indicated that self-esteem attenuated the adverse effect of prolonged treatment (OR = 1.098, p = .017). The Random Forest model demonstrated strong predictive performance (AUC = 0.818), with self-efficacy and self-esteem as the top-ranked predictors.
conclusionsPsychological resources are important for RTW following occupational injury. Self-efficacy and self-esteem were positively associated with RTW, and self-esteem additionally buffered the adverse effect of prolonged treatment duration. These findings support rehabilitation strategies that prioritize modifiable psychological factors to enhance sustainable work reintegration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455290What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.