ArticleHepatology international2026
Prognostic performance of Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 and 2025 sarcopenia definitions in cirrhosis.
Article in Hepatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purpose of the studyThe Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) updated its criteria in 2025, adding a body mass index (BMI)-adjusted muscle index (ASM/BMI) to the conventional skeletal muscle index (SMI). We aimed to compare the prognostic performances of the AWGS 2019 and AWGS 2025 in patients with liver cirrhosis.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 505 patients ≥ 50 years of age with liver cirrhosis who underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis between 2016 and 2025. Sarcopenia was defined using the AWGS 2019 SMI, AWGS 2025 SMI, and AWGS 2025 ASM/BMI criteria. Landmark analysis was performed on day 180, and overall survival was evaluated. The prognostic performance was assessed using Cox regression, time-dependent ROC analysis, and Harrell's C-index.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 5.4 years, 140 deaths occurred. Sarcopenia, as defined by each definition, was independently associated with mortality. The baseline model (age, sex, etiology, and ALBI score) showed a C-index of 0.732. The addition of sarcopenia improved discrimination for SMI-based definitions (ΔC-index 0.033 for AWGS 2025 SMI; 0.023 for AWGS 2019 SMI) but not for AWGS 2025 ASM/BMI (ΔC-index 0.005). At 3 years, the AUC values were 0.828 (AWGS 2025 SMI), 0.822 (AWGS 2019 SMI), and 0.800 (AWGS 2025 ASM/BMI), relative to 0.792 for the baseline model.
conclusionsAWGS 2025 SMI demonstrated robust prognostic performance comparable to or slightly better than that of the AWGS 2019, whereas the AWGS 2025 ASM/BMI provided limited incremental prognostic value. The height-adjusted SMI remains a reliable metric for risk stratification in cirrhosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.