ReviewCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026
The Apelin-APJ Axis in Heart Failure: Mechanistic Insights, Clinical Evidence, and Translational Challenges.
Review in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality despite contemporary guideline-directed therapy, highlighting the need for additional therapeutic strategies, particularly across heterogeneous heart failure phenotypes. The apelin-Elabela-APJ axis has emerged as a biologically relevant pathway because it influences cardiac contractility, vascular tone, endothelial signalling, metabolism, and remodelling through mechanisms distinct from conventional neurohormonal targets. In this review, we examine the molecular biology of apelin, Elabela, and APJ, and critically appraise the preclinical and clinical evidence across heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and related cardiomyopathic states. Although experimental data and early haemodynamic studies support potential therapeutic relevance, recent setbacks with orally active APJ agonists highlight important translational challenges, including pharmacokinetic constraints, altered receptor biology in advanced disease, signalling complexity, and limited phenotypic stratification. We also discuss key research gaps and future directions, including biomarker standardisation, more human-relevant translational models, and endotype-informed trial design, that may help clarify whether apelin-targeted strategies have value in selected heart failure settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.