ArticlePharmacoEconomics2026
Inhaled Levodopa for the Management of OFF Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOFF episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD), where symptoms worsen despite symptomatic treatment, are associated with significant burden on patients, carers and healthcare providers. There is an unmet need for an effective, on-demand treatment for OFF episodes that provides fast-acting symptom relief. This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of inhaled levodopa (LD) compared with relevant alternatives from a UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective.
methodsA Markov model was developed comparing inhaled LD with subcutaneous (SC) apomorphine, sublingual (SL) apomorphine, dispersible LD and no on-demand treatment (no-ODT) in adults with advanced PD treated with LD and carbidopa and experiencing OFF episodes. A lifetime time horizon was adopted. Within-trial and beyond-trial models were applied for initial treatment and subsequent therapy, respectively. Model structure comprised 12 health states: ten 'Off' states, an 'On' state and death. Clinical trials and a network meta-analysis informed clinical inputs, with natural history progression applied from year 3. UK national databases and published literature informed costs (2025) and utility data. A 3.5% yearly discount rate is applied to costs and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses and three scenarios exploring alternative progression through health states, caregiver costs and disutilities, as well as subsequent therapy adverse events, were conducted.
resultsIn base-case analysis, inhaled LD dominated versus dispersible LD and no-ODT and was associated with lower cost and lower quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus SC and SL apomorphine. Nevertheless, inhaled LD resulted in net monetary benefit (NMB) of £14,226 and £25,939 compared with SC and SL apomorphine, respectively, at a £25,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Key model drivers were subsequent therapy costs, discontinuation rates and health state utility values. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis highlighted uncertainty in the model; however, mean probabilistic sensitivity analysis results, along with two scenario analyses, remained consistent with the base case.
conclusionsInhaled LD may be an economically dominant treatment strategy when compared with dispersible LD and no-ODT. When compared with SC and SL apomorphine, cost-savings with inhaled LD may outweigh potentially fewer QALYs, resulting in an NMB.
Identifiers
42455231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.