Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42455228›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2026

Trends in informal and formal care utilisation and unmet care needs among older adults in Korea: evidence from repeated national surveys.

Eun Ha Namkung, Hyewon Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eun Ha NamkungDepartment of Social Welfare, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. enamkung@ewha.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9874-6761
Hyewon KimDepartment of Social Welfare, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing number of older adults with functional limitations has significant implications for care policy in rapidly ageing societies. This study examined trends in informal care, formal care, and unmet care needs among older Koreans, considering both individual characteristics and broader societal change. Using four waves of the National Survey of Older Koreans from 2014, 2017, 2020, and 2023, we analysed community-residing adults aged 65 and older with functional limitations and estimated survey-weighted multinomial regression models. Adjusted results showed a substantial rise in unmet care needs, from 20.4% in 2014 to 52.4% in 2023. Informal care from family and friends declined sharply, while the increase in formal care use was insufficient to compensate for this loss. Sensitivity analyses restricted to those with severe impairment also showed that unmet care needs still increased over time, but the magnitude of the increase was attenuated. However, among those with severe impairment, predicted probabilities of receiving formal care were relatively stable and even showed a decreasing trend. Older age, cognitive impairment, and a greater number of limitations were consistently associated with formal care utilisation relative to no care. These factors also predicted receipt of informal care relative to no care, although their statistical significance was less evident in recent years. These findings suggest that Korea's care system has not fully adapted to declining family-based care, accompanied by relatively unchanged formal care receipt rates and rising unmet care needs. Expanding formal care services and supporting informal caregivers remain priorities for improving elder care.

Indexed as

Family caregivingLong-term carePaid caregivingSouth Korea

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.