ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Treatment of proximal femur fractures in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) : Review of perioperative management].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProximal femur fractures are common injuries in older adults and, according to guidelines, require prompt surgical treatment. With the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), uncertainties have arisen regarding the timing of surgery, the risk of bleeding, and perioperative management. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim is to evaluate the influence of DOACs on the timing of surgery, the risk of bleeding, and the safety of early surgical treatment for proximal femur fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsNarrative review of the current literature, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and current guideline recommendations (AWMF S3-LL).
resultsPatients on DOACs sometimes exhibit significantly prolonged time to surgery (TTS), often due to uncertainties in perioperative management. However, prolonged TTS is not consistently associated with increased mortality. The majority of studies show no significant difference in blood loss or transfusion requirements between DOAC-treated and nonanticoagulated patients when treated early. Calibrated laboratory methods are the gold standard, but are only available to a limited extent. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PPSB) and antidotes allow for reversal; however, the latter sometimes carry specific risks.
conclusionBased on current data, early surgery for proximal femur fractures can be performed despite DOAC use, particularly for minimally invasive procedures with a low risk of bleeding. Individual risk assessment, taking into account comorbidities, residual DOAC levels, and the type and extent of the procedure, remains crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455168What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.