ReviewSurgery today2026
Current status of various types of ICG contrast imaging in pediatric thoracic surgery.
Review in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is an emerging intraoperative navigation tool. However, its application in pediatric thoracic surgery remains to be elucidated. This review evaluates the current status and clinical utility of ICG-based imaging techniques in the field. A narrative review of studies published between January 2015 and February 2026 was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Relevant original articles, reviews, and case reports were included. Data were analyzed by focusing on indications, administration methods, and clinical outcomes. Additionally, representative cases of chylothorax and congenital pulmonary airway malformations from our institution were included. Thirty-eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. ICG imaging enables real-time visualization of lymphatic leakage in chylothorax, rapid identification of intersegmental planes in pulmonary resections, and ventilation-based lesion delineation using inhaled ICG. It also supports fistula localization and perfusion assessment in patients with esophageal diseases. In oncology, ICG shows high sensitivity for detecting hepatoblastoma lung metastases, although its specificity is limited. ICG fluorescence imaging improves intraoperative visualization and precision during pediatric thoracic surgery. However, current evidence remains limited, and further standardization and prospective validation are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455159What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.