ArticleSurgery today2026
Does graft implantation sequence affect post-transplant outcome in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation? An analysis of a nationwide registry in Japan.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesSimultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is an effective treatment for type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal disease. However, whether the graft implantation sequence influences the outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the impact of implantation order on graft and patient outcomes using data from the Japanese Pancreas Transplant Registry.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with SPK during the study period. Patients were categorized into pancreas-first (P-first) or kidney-first (K-first) groups based on the ischemic time of each graft. The outcomes assessed included graft loss, graft survival, and patient survival. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to compare the groups. Subgroup analyses were also performed, including assessments of transfer time.
resultsAmong 449 SPK recipients, 346 were in the K-first group and 103 in the P-first group. No significant differences were observed between the groups with regard to pancreatic or kidney graft loss, graft survival, or patient survival. These findings remained consistent across all subgroup analyses and in models that used transfer time as a continuous variable.
conclusionsThe graft implantation sequence did not significantly affect graft or patient outcomes following SPK. The order can be chosen based on surgeon preference or institutional protocols, without compromising the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.