ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2026
Improving Hip Fracture Prediction by Using Sarcopenia-Specific Cut-Offs of T-Scores for Osteosarcopenia: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults with osteosarcopenia, defined as the coexistence of osteopenia/osteoporosis and sarcopenia, have been associated with an increased risk of fractures compared with those with normal bone mineral density (BMD) and without sarcopenia. However, the conventional definition of osteosarcopenia has led to mixed results on its predictive accuracy for hip fractures. We aimed to define osteosarcopenia by identifying sex-specific cut-offs for low BMD according to different sarcopenia statuses and compare its predictive performance with osteosarcopenia defined conventionally and osteoporosis alone.
methodsA cohort of 4000 community-dwelling older adults (2000 females, mean age 72.5 ± 5.2 years) was recruited. Body composition and BMD of hip, lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline. According to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus, all participants were classified as non-sarcopenia, possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia. Incidence of hip fractures was documented during the follow-up period from 2001 to 2013. The classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to identify the optimal cut-off values of T-scores for participants with possible sarcopenia and those with sarcopenia, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the associations between osteosarcopenia and hip fractures. The discrimination and predictive ability of osteosarcopenia were evaluated by Uno's concordance index (C-index), time-dependent net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).
resultsDuring an average of 9.2 years of follow-up, 63 (3.2%) men and 69 (3.5%) women had at least one hip fracture. Sex- and sarcopenia-specific cut-offs of T-scores were identified (men with possible sarcopenia: T-score < -2.2; men with sarcopenia: T-score < -2.0; women with possible sarcopenia: T-score < -2.1; women with sarcopenia: T-score ≤ -2.5). Osteosarcopenia defined with these specific cut-offs was associated with an increased risk of hip fractures independent of clinical risk factors in both men and women (HR = 5.232, 95% CI = 3.172-8.631, and HR = 3.574, 95% CI = 2.01-6.355, respectively). It had the highest Uno's C-index (men: 0.774 and women: 0.750, respectively) and outperformed osteosarcopenia using conventional definition and osteoporosis alone in predicting hip fractures by using NRI and IDI approaches.
conclusionsOur findings suggested that including possible sarcopenia and adopting sex- and sarcopenia-specific cut-offs to define osteosarcopenia could improve hip fracture prediction. Further studies are warranted to validate the cut-offs of T-score identified in our cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.