ArticleDiabetes2026
Developmental Control of DNA Damage Responses in α- and β-Cells Shapes the Selective β-Cell Susceptibility in Diabetes.
Article in Diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accumulation of DNA damage drives β-cell dysfunction, senescence, and death in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Although α-cell dysfunction also contributes to disease pathology, α-cells remain remarkably resistant to senescence and increased cell death under diabetogenic stress. The mechanisms underlying these differential responses to diabetogenic stress, particularly differences in their DNA damage vulnerability, remain unclear. We demonstrate that replication introduces a window of genomic vulnerability in both α- and β-cells during neonatal growth, with α-cells exhibiting higher replication rates and DNA damage. We show that neonatal β-cells resolve DNA damage more efficiently during mitosis and favor error-free repair, whereas α-cells compensate for their greater DNA-damage vulnerability through increased cellular turnover. Using mouse models of overnutrition and diabetes, we show that β-cells exhibit greater vulnerability to terminal DNA damage and impaired repair capacity under diabetogenic stress, with compensatory replication amplifying this vulnerability. We demonstrate that developmental and postnatal epigenetic programs shape the differential DNA damage vulnerability of postnatal β- and α-cells. Loss of de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in pancreatic progenitors selectively increases the DNA damage vulnerability of β-cells from neonatal growth through adulthood. Complementing this developmental process, enhancer analyses reveal lineage-specific DNA damage response regulatory landscapes that are remodeled in β-cells under metabolic stress. Collectively, our findings uncover novel developmental mechanisms that shape the distinct DNA damage responses of postnatal β- and α-cells during growth and diabetes. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS: Mechanisms underlying the differential susceptibility of pancreatic β- and α-cells to diabetogenic stress remain unclear. We investigated whether replication, repair fidelity, and developmental epigenetic programs determine the vulnerability of postnatal β- and α-cells to DNA damage, a key driver of β-cell failure in diabetes. Replication introduces DNA damage vulnerability in both neonatal β- and α-cells, yet β-cells resolve damage more efficiently. Loss of DNA methyltransferase 3a in pancreatic progenitors selectively heightens β-cell DNA damage vulnerability that persists into adulthood. Moreover, diabetogenic stress preferentially compromises β-cell repair fidelity. These findings reveal how developmental programs shape β-cell resilience and may influence lifelong diabetes risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.