Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454959›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2026

Host community activity, but not always composition, explains viral biogeography in bulk and rhizosphere soils over a tomato growing season.

Lucie Stern, Anneliek M Ter Horst, Konner E Simpson-Johnson, Amélie C M Gaudin, Joanne B Emerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucie SternDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0691-2142
Anneliek M Ter HorstDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8722-7037
Konner E Simpson-JohnsonDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Amélie C M GaudinDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4007-9991
Joanne B EmersonDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9983-5566

Funding

USDA NIFA 2021-144 67013-34815-0USDA NIFA Hatch CA-D145 PPA-2464-HUSDA NIFA OREI 2024-51300-43051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The soil microbiome is key to plant health and nutrient acquisition, and viruses likely play important but largely unknown roles in these processes. To interrogate bulk and rhizosphere soil viral biogeography, we collected samples over a tomato growing season in California from an experiment testing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) treatment. We generated 78 viromes, 16S rRNA gene, and ITS1 amplicon datasets, and 33 rhizosphere metatranscriptomes. Of 67 038 DNA viral "species" genomes (vOTUs), 25% were previously identified, predominantely in agricultural systems, suggesting habitat filtering and greater viral homogeneity across agricultural compared to natural soils globally. Rhizospheres had significantly higher DNA viral richness than bulk soils, whereas no significant richness differences were observed for other biota. 60% of vOTUs were shared between compartments, compared to only 21-23% of bacterial and fungal taxa. Although bulk soil viral biogeography resembled that of prokaryotes, with significant structuring by moisture content, greater virome similarity between high-moisture bulk soils and rhizospheres suggests that conditions with high host activity selected for similar viral communities. In rhizospheres, while bacterial and fungal communities differed most over time, DNA and RNA viral communities differed most by sampling location, matching prokaryotic transcriptional patterns and further implicating host activity in viral biogeography. Similarly, AMF treatment induced changes in the prokaryotic transcriptome but, across biota, only significantly affected DNA viral communities. Overall, results indicate strong viral responses to spatiotemporally localized conditions, with viral biogeography reflecting both dispersal opportunities (high between neighboring bulk and rhizosphere soils, low across fields) and selection via local host activity.

Indexed as

RhizosphereSoil MicrobiologySolanum lycopersicumVirusesBacteriaCaliforniaMicrobiotaMycorrhizaeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeasonsSoilViromeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilagriculturephagesrhizospheresoilviromesViruses

Identifiers

PMID42454959
PMCPMC13671227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.